The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A glance at the graph provided reveals some striking trends about the UK students who have just completed their studies as graduation or post graduation in 2008.

As is illustrated in the chart, overall, mostly students opted further studies, while a few went for voluntary works.

Bar chart depicting the facts about graduated students, suggests that there are a great deal larger number of students who went for advanced studies- the exact figure is 29,665, while the number of students who took part into voluntary works stood at just 3,500. Besides, 17,735 students were chosen as part-time employees, nonetheless, around same number remained unemployeed.

Additionally, in the post graduate chart, the overall number of students decreased compared to students who did graduation, nevertheless, overall trend stayed same. Most students went for further studies and the least number of students opted voluntary works, the exact figures are 2,725 and 345 respectively. 2,535 students worked as part-time after passing out, while other 1625 students remained unemployed.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...udents, suggests that there are a great deal larger number of students who went for ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59146341463 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68798719005 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3720849159 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194826500123 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979390458629 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446983274499 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119699908983 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446020127494 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.