The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.

A glance at the graph provided reveals some striking facts about water usage around the world and in some specific countries as well, during 2000.

As is illustrated in the graph, overall, the largest usage of water was done in the agriculture, while household usage remained the least one around the globe.

According to the chart, 70% water was used in agriculture, followed by industry with 22%, around the globe, while house hold water usage was just 8%.

Furthermore, India and China from the listed countries spent a great deal larger proportion of the water in their agriculture fields, 92% and 69% respectively, about half the number in New Zealand, 44%. The least agricultural-water usage stood at 8% in Canada. However, Canada consumed largest percentage of water in the industry, exactly 80%. Besides, in China the number for industrial-water consumption is 22% and in New Zealand, nearly just half the number to that in China, 10%. In India, industry-water consumption stayed least one, just 3%.

In New Zealand, household usage of water stood at 46%, the largest one compared to other listed countries. Canada stood at second position with 12% water usage at home, while China stayed just at 9%. Again as the case was in industry, the numbers of water usage stayed exactly 5% in India in the case of consumption at home.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'consumed the largest'.
Suggestion: consumed the largest
... stood at 8% in Canada. However, Canada consumed largest percentage of water in the industry, ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...numbers of water usage stayed exactly 5% in India in the case of consumption at h...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00892857143 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7767570049 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504464285714 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.415691779 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174303807003 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770505889807 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515831879104 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117386054405 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533411454407 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.