In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In various nations, the people are widely affected in terms of health level by consuming excess junk food items and the number is increasing continuously. It is argued by some individuals that the state must execute higher duties against these foods items. I completely agree with the notion as it will limit people from purchasing rubbish consumer food products and the interest in this food business will be discouraged.

To begin with, imposing high duties can curb health problems by limiting people from eating these junk food items. Many economical people will limit themselves to a certain extent from eating junk foods after the price hike in these consumer goods. Therefore, health problems can be minimized to some level. A recent survey from the Nutrition department revealed that the majority of the health risks are associated with junk food consumption, thus curbing people from eating these fast food items via increasing tax can control health problems.

Similarly, the increase in taxation will demotivate businesses involving unhealthy food products. This rise in the cost of the material will affect the business and new emerging venture of this business will try to find other alternatives rather than continuing the struggle. For instance, In Delhi, the government raised the duty against street vendors and as a result around 100 shops were closed within 2 months of the initiative. Hence, less source of junk food items will directly prevent people from getting infected.

In conclusion, I believe that an increase in taxation on fast food products will improve the health status of society because of the reasons mentioned in the above paragraphs.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27985074627 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58375787274 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9830791054 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326737117129 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127029719286 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527034796371 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194464534336 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634335405611 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.