In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule?Use specific reasons and details to support your position.You should write at least 250 words.
It is a proven fact that smoking is highly injurious to health. Around the globe, the government adopts multiple ways to discourage people from smoking. Recently, it has been observed that in some countries, smokers are not allowed to enjoy this activity publically or inside the buildings. I consider this as an extremely positive development towards a healthy society.
To begin with, the restriction on smoking in public areas will definitely help reduce passive smokers. The smokers are not only affecting themselves but a huge number of people living in the surroundings are equally harmed. These victims are called,” Passive smokers”. These people do not really do smoking themselves; rather, inhale the smoke while their relatives or co-workers are smoking nearby them. According to the recent survey by the local community magazine, 70% of the passive smokers suffer fatal diseases because of the smoke they inhale unwillingly.
To elucidate my stance further, the ban on open smoking would also discourage smokers. In order to satisfy their need, they would have to look for a particular space; designated for this activity. Psychologically, they would be inclined to reduce smoking intervals as every time they would have to get into the hassle of walking all the way outside the building. Quoting my personal observation here, in my company, smokers have a designated area, this policy has evidently brought a positive change in the smoking habit of my colleagues. For instance, if they used to go for smoking for five to seven times a day, now that number has gone down to two to three only. Eventually, this change would certainly leave a positive impact on their health.
In conclusion, I reiterate that this approach would definitely pave ways for a healthy society. Bounded space smoking enforcement would be beneficial not only for individual smokers but also for passive smokers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...equally harmed. These victims are called,' Passive smokers'. These people do...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23127035831 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82385813955 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1785460542 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111155446222 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391291806071 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384467216733 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750560193229 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396644451368 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.