In some countries, people are now buying fewer new things and buying more second-hand things instead. In your opinion, what are some possible reasons for this?
Is this a positive or negative trend?
People are owing used products rather than purchasing brand new products in specific countries. This essay will explore numerous causes behind this scenario and It will outline that this is a positive development.
There are myriad things in the favour of why many individuals are deciding to get old items. First and foremost, it is more budget-friendly compare to order a new one. This is because someone can find an identical product in the market while incurring less amount of money. Additionally, they can spend the aforementioned saved amount in the future development of the family and fulfill basic amenities or children's carrier which might help them to improve their lifestyle in the long term. For example, instead of spending on new objects, parents invest their livelihood in the future of the children’s education, which will lead to achieving success in upcoming life.
However, in my view, this is a positive trend, because it is more eco-friendly. The reason for this is that trend reduces landfills, as it is already in use by second users which might mitigate the land pollution in the modern age. For instance, the report of the global times indicates that 10 percent of land pollution comes from plastic toys which in usable conditions and no one has to use it and people buying new toys. If second-hand item users do not utilize these products, it will increase the area of infertile land in the country. As a result, a reduction of the green area on the globe causes the greenhouse effect.
In conclusion, people are more inclined to purchasing pre-used goods as this is more environment-friendly and increase the level of daily routine.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01798561151 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87185783313 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.481895792 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24966144093 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771635712277 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516443447048 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138364002739 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386048167961 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.