Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects o

Essay topics:

Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.

Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Various initiatives are being taken by the employers in order to keep their employees healthy and productive. Whereas some employees think that, such programs are not effective. We will discuss both sides in depth.

With increasing work pressure, employees have started feeling demotivated and are not able to use their potential to maximum. Companies are providing various recreational activities to their employees such as movie vouchers, gym and sports club membership, free holidays etc to make sure that employees heath don't suffer due to work. Such subsidies helps employees to cope with stress and produce maximum output. It is also important to maintain balance between work and life. Various perks like free family heath check up and shopping vouchers are also provided as a gesture to take care of employees family members.

To measure the effectiveness of an initiative company needs proper data. Problem with these leisure subsidies is that it can't be measured in quantitative parameters like target based work. On the other hands, not all the employees are motivated by these subsidies as all the employees have different expectations. Companies offer various on the job training's, rewards, pay increments, financial rewards to keep their employees productive. Some employers have also started day release programs so their can be change in surrounding and at the same time, learning can also be done.

As per my opinion, these health related subsidies are superficial and are not practically viable at large scale. Rather, companies should spend on training so learning can be an ongoing process. Family floater heath insurance cover can be provided to employees to ensure that they have proper medical provision in case of contingency.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-07 Rina Arora 78 view
Essays by user Rina Arora :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ip, free holidays etc to make sure that employees heath dont suffer due to work. Such sub...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s etc to make sure that employees heath dont suffer due to work. Such subsidies help...
^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
...dont suffer due to work. Such subsidies helps employees to cope with stress and produ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...with these leisure subsidies is that it cant be measured in quantitative parameters ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this health' or 'these healths'?
Suggestion: this health; these healths
...can also be done. As per my opinion, these health related subsidies are superficial and a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77758453434 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9147529117 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205566094327 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643954667247 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468637343785 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126097501057 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520071351591 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.