The advancement in the field of science and technology has enabled most employers to remain in touch with their employees beyond official working hours. While it may have a few advantages, I believe that the disadvantages of this extended contact after office hours and even on holidays outweigh any possible benefit.
There are only a few positive aspects to being able to contact employees at at all times. It allows smooth flow of information between colleagues and enhances their coordination. It may be necessary in the case of people working in fields such as police department or emergency health care. In these occupations it may be pertinent to obtain certain pieces of information from employees immediately, and one cannot wait for their vacations to get over. However, only a handful of jobs would necessitate such a situation.
Conversely, there are numerous drawbacks to being in constant touch with one’s official colleagues. Invariably, such flexibility results in employers repeatedly contacting their workers beyond their stipulated official hours for trivial things. The result in that some employees are never able to take work off their minds even during holidays. Their mind is constantly thinking of some official work or the other. This leads to unnecessary stress among employees. And their work efficiency reduces drastically.
Furthermore, being in constant touch with colleagues through phone or emails hampers the family relationships and the social life of most people. This adds to their stress levels leading to further decline in their work output. Hence, such frequent contacts are not beneficial for either employees or employers.
To conclude, in my perspective, barring a few professions, employers should not be encouraged to contact their workers after office hours. This is because the negative impacts of doing this are far greater than the positives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: at
...ects to being able to contact employees at at all times. It allows smooth flow of inf...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44594594595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89626941983 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8337941986 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301093535887 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865817948793 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661265353118 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159979777089 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036299318506 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.