Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries' development. However, other people hold the opposite opinion. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Hosting a sporting event is a matter of great honor for any country. While some people believe that these events will be beneficial to the nation, others oppose the notion. This essay will discuss both the viewpoints before finally giving a personal opinion.
To begin with, these events contribute to the development of a country in numerous ways. There will be a surge of employment rates in order to provide the best services. More tourists will travel to the host country to attend the event and cheer for the players of their respective country. Due to an influx of tourists, more hotels will be booked and souvenirs will be purchased which will in turn contribute to the economy of the nation. For example, when a sporting event was hosted in Delhi, it generated a lot of revenue which was used to build flyovers, thereby aiding in the reduction of the traffic congestion to a greater extent.
However, the concern of the opposing group is not invalid either as this type of events will create some negative impacts as well. As the toursists will be more interested in visiting the event place, there will be scarcity of visitors in other states and areas. The main city will be overcrowded, as various resources as well as top notch security will need to be allocated for the incoming visitors. Consequently, traffic congestion will also increase thereby raising the pollution levels. But these problems can be overcome with sufficient measures taken by the government.
To conclude, the hosting of sporting events will not only aid in increasing the employment rates but also contribute to the economic development of the nation. Though there could be some negative effects to this but with effective measures in place by the authorities it can be avoided. Hence, I vehemently believe that these events are beneficial to the development of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... the viewpoints before finally giving a personal opinion. To begin with, these events contribut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...rowded, as various resources as well as top notch security will need to be allocated for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, hence, however, so, well, while, as to, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96166134185 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66003557876 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517571884984 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8320761261 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141097000212 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05919826045 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587251895634 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119265921176 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884221343508 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.