In life, different events including bad situations may happen to people. Lack of money and low job satisfaction are the examples. While some people think that the best way to face bad circumstances is by accepting it, others believe to strive to get better conditions.
On the one hand, accepting terrible situations which occur has good advantages. It may help us being less stressful because we will learn to accept and to be thankful. For the example, an employee who is paid with low wages. Instead of complaining and whining about his situation, he chooses to be thankful, because he still gets a job and payment, and not becomes unemployed. However, accepting is not the only way to deal with unwanted circumstances.
Some people are dealing with unwanted situations by striving to change them. They think that opportunity is always there for someone who strives, including changing of their bad situations. For instance, a case that involve another employee who is also paid with low wages. Rather than just accepting his condition, he tries to improve his performance and avoids his past mistakes. Furthermore, he also attempts to learn new knowledge and skills which may be beneficial for his working performance. As a result, he is finally able to get out of his bad situation and gets a better payment.
In conclusion, accepting is good way to deal with bad circumstances, but striving to improve bad situations is a better way because it can help people to shift to their expected conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...cur has good advantages. It may help us being less stressful because we will learn to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00793650794 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89882514147 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8326976688 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210766068069 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743142829344 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062288347071 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154628442077 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675322982881 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.