It is trivial to find arguments about the Government allocating more funds for public sector rather than spending on art. It would be beneficial to expand funding on public services, however eradicating spending on art could be detrimental.
There are plethora of benefits that would entail after the government initiates a larger funding on public services. Firstly, every citizen has the right to equal treatment. Equal treatment can begin with basic education. It is common to see high-class families spending a large amount on private education and lower-class families suffering. Education is a basic right and should be equally approachable by all, regardless of class. Educating students from all levels of society would benefit the nation as a whole with creative ideas and greater development in the future. Moreover, enhancing public services could encompass better healthcare and public transportation due to increasing living costs globally.
Furthermore, art is an area that encapsulates the essence of a nation. Obliterating spending on such a vital area would cause the nation a huge downfall. It is intriguing to learn about the past and it would be beneficial for future generations to know about how the nation was developed. The culture, language, and traditions speak loudly through art and it should be preserved.
The government holds a vital role in caring for the citizens. Not all citizens are well-off and thus, require assistance in public services. Designating a greater budget for public services can help the government motivate citizens to live a better life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93872353242 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3332149619 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.375 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139335676177 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044710130204 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465490760056 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891818436678 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446141269456 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.