Many people think modern communication technology is having negative effects on social relationship. Do you agree or disagree?

It is a common belief that the use of advanced technology inculcates better social values among people. On the flip side, people argue that current technology has, in fact, negatively affected man's social conduct. This essay will look into both of these views and then will conclude the essay with personal opinion.
This is true that over the last century or so technology has improved with leaps and bounds, and has brought a very positive change in the social behavior as well as the social activities of the humans. Extraordinary means of transport have made it possible to travel far and wide across the globe, and this of course has promoted social interaction. For instance, people now travel long distances to attend the wedding ceremonies and other social meet-ups courtesy fast moving planes or bullet trains.
On the other hand, there seems truth in the fact that some of the technological advancements have had adverse effect on the social norms of individuals as well as communities. Advanced telecommunication technology has 'locked' people in a bubble. This is true especially of a large number of teenagers and youngsters, who have lost their social connection because they are too much into gaming and browsing online. For example, in my family, most youngsters love spending their time playing video games or browsing the Internet.
In my opinion, despite the fact that current technology does sometimes keep us away from each other, it can be used to advance and promote better social demeanor. Individuals need to understand and adapt to the complex nature of social influences of technology.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...s and then will conclude the essay with personal opinion. This is true that over the last cen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nclude the essay with personal opinion. This is true that over the last century ...
^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...and, there seems truth in the fact that some of the technological advancements have had adv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...in a bubble. This is true especially of a large number of teenagers and youngsters, who have lost...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure of social influences of technology.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in fact, of course, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12878787879 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72878745815 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617424242424 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0701107607 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197947233393 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755371261378 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490685906465 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116758585489 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257973721467 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.