Some people believe that governments should spend more money on public services rather than waste money on creative arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Indeed , it becomes moot-point among masses that where to spend more on public welfare or on arts as handful of folks contend that still many issues exist besides arts. I also endorse the same view point of the opponents.

Admittedly, art does not proclaim a critical aspect for the sustainability of humans life yet it would not disappear owing to their possessing of a life with lower taste of esthetic. Moreover, multitude of arts projects are expensive comprising no obvious outcomes which have direct relations with a nations income. For instance, many times, regime generally spend on those items of art which could not even allure tourists such as on sculptures or other iconic possessions.

Moving towards other justifications of opponents of art spending, it also costs more to maintain such sculptures. To epitomize , it is hard to keep Kohinoor diamond in British Royal Museum as it costs more for its maintenance. Also, no officials could justify the income from art. furthermore , ample of issues also exist which require rulers attention like unemployment, illiteracy, female foeticide , population explosion and many more.

Eventually, it can be deduced that supporting other issues is more vital for government to enhance the quality of life of residents rather than providing more artistic facilities.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Indeed , it becomes moot-point among masses that...
^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it becomes moot-point among masses that where to spend more on public welfare or...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...omes which have direct relations with a nations income. For instance, many times, regim...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o maintain such sculptures. To epitomize , it is hard to keep Kohinoor diamond in...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in such sculptures. To epitomize , it is hard to keep Kohinoor diamond in British...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...als could justify the income from art. furthermore , ample of issues also exist which requ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ustify the income from art. furthermore , ample of issues also exist which requir...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...employment, illiteracy, female foeticide , population explosion and many more. ...
^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y more. Eventually, it can be deduced that supporting other issues is more vit...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33492822967 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87225734236 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6343072699 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0892319552931 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328575806657 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040987298111 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641826438129 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418166975433 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.