With the invention of the internet, securing data and information from unauthorized access has become significantly important. While it is advised by some people that making more and more information, related to research; the corporate world; or education, publicly available is in the best interest of society; however, others argue that certain information should be kept confidential either because of its sensitive nature or economical purpose. I consider that making certain information accessible to limited stakeholders or the general public entirely depends on its nature.
In several scenarios, sharing a particular set of information has tremendous advantages. Firstly, scientific breakthroughs particularly in the field of medicines ought to be disseminated globally, so that a large number of patients suffering from incurable diseases reap the benefits. In addition, conglomerates who disclose the detail of their corporate social responsibility initiatives on the website enjoy a positive reputation by its customers and this is reflected in their business performance. Finally, it is imperative to distribute knowledge of educational significance because this is the only way further enhancement can be made to it.
However, the distribution of highly sensitive data might have negative implications. Firstly, it makes no sense to spread information about the national security of any country because it is highly likely that terrorists or enemies would use this to carry out terrorism in order to invade the countries. Similarly, manufacturing companies disclosing data related to the recipe of its products is useless and will be misused by its competitors, resulting in the loss of market share and business. Clearly, there are reasons behind not sharing information with everyone.
Having considered the matter in-depth, I can conclude that restricting access to information is dependent on the purpose and it cannot be simply generalized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...cessible to limited stakeholders or the general public entirely depends on its nature. In s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ht to be disseminated globally, so that a large number of patients suffering from incurable disea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76288659794 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2809214238 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0036763712 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.75 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186605736012 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661679669372 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504641659076 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103771572884 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289142011812 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.