Some people believe that students should be allowed to evaluate and criticise their
teachers to improve the quality of education. Others think this is disrespectful to teachers.
Discuss both views, give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Opinions are divided on whether students are able to evaluate and critise their teachers to enhance the educational processes, or it might disrespect teachers. I believe that both perspectives offer some real reasons, although they may appeal to different types of people
Today, educational approach to participatory teaching methods, it is very good for students evaluate and critise the teachers because these will bring benefits for both teachers and students when students provide their feedback, teachers can measure what students understand lessons, what teachers should enhance their methodologies to help students as well as strengthen their teaching skills. these also attribute the critical thinking of students because they can raise their ideas, ask questions or give their opinions
On the other hand, evaluating and critising teachers is disrespectful teachers. This opinion may come from the traditional approach teaching where they prefer one way teaching, teachers are the centre and the one who only provide knowledge without receiving feedback, all students should respect and obey older people or high academic like teachers and they likely to feel more appreciated.
In my opinion,s, both views have their own benefits for students and teachers to improve the quality of education. However, students have the right to give their voices to evaluate teachers; they must have their boundaries to help them understand what they should or shouldn’t do to respect their teachers.
In conclusion, as explained earlier, both views prove to offer good points, and this fact makes it hard for one to identify their opinions on this issue. Just the same, I still prefer students can evaluate and critise their teachers with positive way to respect their teachers
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ll as strengthen their teaching skills. these also attribute the critical thinking of...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...o feel more appreciated. In my opinion,s, both views have their own benefits for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48363636364 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69692202886 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516363636364 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.591228785 49.4020404114 248% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.5 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.375 20.7667163134 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.875 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216111860902 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120068203746 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464068190554 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141268367699 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365850841305 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 9.78957915832 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.