Some people believe that TV is a useful invention. To what extent you agree with the statement. Give your opinion and explain with the observations and examples from your personal experience.
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on the TV as a useful device for people can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My opinion is that irrespective to the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I have mixed thoughts to whether or not TV is a useful invention.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, several people believe that TV is beneficial to their daily routine, and it provides a lot of instant information and news which affect their activities. It is important to notice that if there is a sudden weather change which is not expected in the normal day, many people tend to follow the weather forecast programs to keep them safe fromsuch changes. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that TV, with its live programs, provides extremely important information to people who depend on its specific weather programs.
Another pivotal role of the arguments is that the invention of the TV plays a significant role in family entertainment, and it helps them in several educational activities. When parents want to educate their children for better development, there are plenty of kid`s channels which give this contents. This exemplifies that TV has a pivotal role in children behavior and knowledge.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that we cannot neglect the importance of the TV in people daily life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10843373494 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02885804633 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570281124498 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1563646749 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154286559436 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561318873832 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392073296477 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085329029995 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313380921797 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.