Films are one of the most important when it comes to means of recreation; but some argue that not all types of films spread positivity. They deem brutality in films may encourages the audience to do the same; whereas others disagree with this by arguing that there is no clear connections between movies and real life. This essay partially agree with both sides of the argument which I will elucidate in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, as said earlier, movies are gradually becoming inseparable from human life. As the content showed in films will likely influence how one thinks, they also define what is right or wrong, good or bad for the viewers. Consequently, fans may copy their favorite actors or celebrities. For example, if our protagonist is a short tempered person, who likes to talk with fist, the spectators will likely be affected by that behavior and do the same. Therefore, by glorifying violence, films are creating aggressive audiences.
On the contrary, the existence of savagery on screen has always been there since the beginning. There are a variety of evidences such as fight between two nations, between two gangs or about a serial killer. Many studies have shown that the rise and fall of violent occur in real life are unrelatable to the trend of brutality scenes in movies. Therefore, one could say that violence and violence and film are two separate things.
By considering the factors, though some films may have a negative impact on one's mind, I believe that the actions in life and in films are unconnected. With that being said, it is recommend for the producer to tag the age group for their films so as to prevent unfortunate consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recommended'.
Suggestion: recommended
...nconnected. With that being said, it is recommend for the producer to tag the age group f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...er to tag the age group for their films so as to prevent unfortunate consequences.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89895470383 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65838359966 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0488969837 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288205600691 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853879794263 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698898949687 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163556243501 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429512150859 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.