In today's world majority of people has a notion that higher the price better the product. To evaluate the performance of any commodity or service, the price tag should not be the only factor to take into consideration. There are numerous examples which are self-explanatory, and shows it is not necessarily money can guarantee the best results. I moderately agree with idea that cost should be reviewed depending on the outcome of an item/ service purchased.
Firstly, before picking up any item people should ponder the main reason behind it. For example, is it worth spending $1000 for iPhone X? Do you really need a phone with all these features? Is it a phone you are going after or the Apple brand? While getting any of these commodities apart from price, other features like performance, durability, usage etc. should be considered as well. Secondly, people buy things due to social pressure as well, and without realizing whether they are in need or not.
On the other hand, people should not compromise on services like medical treatment, as health is precious. People spend lavishly on their lifestyles, but when it comes to health some of them are reluctant to pay a higher price. For example, people in underdeveloped countries even if they have a buying power they sometimes refuse to get better service just for sake of money. If one can afford, they should look after their health, mental as well as physical.
To conclude, the price should be assessed, but it should not be the only factor or reason to buy an item. On the contrary, people should not hesitate to spend when it comes to their wellbeing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, for example, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89568345324 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6512645992 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586330935252 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6169767371 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0588235294 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192473061447 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060903271255 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043909761308 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112894611026 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256811742051 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.