Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits.
Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why?
You should write at least 250 words.
Certain individuals like changes in their existing lifestyle and to experience new adventures, whereas others, do not accept any change in their surroundings. In my opinion, I do believe that being more adaptable and flexible to different situations will aid you to be more successful in future.
Many individuals do not prefer any difference in their environment. They like to stay at the same place and with their usual habits. They feel more stressed when things are not the same moreover, they like to do things for which they know the outcome and feel the agitation of doing unknow and non- familiar activities fearing of new sets of possibilities and problems will occur. Furthermore, people don’t prefer any alteration in their surrounding because of lack of trust. They do not have confidence in the person bringing the change and thus like to stay in their familiar environment.
Several individuals like change and to live their life out of their comfort zone. They believe that new challenges will help on their personal growth as they will learn the way to react in different situation. They will gain more self-confidence, patience and adaptability. Additionally, they believe that by taking the opportunity of working in a new, unfamiliar environment help them to not only improve their financial condition but also to be more successful in future. To elucidate, people have earned fame and success in their life and their business by accepting challenges and being adventurous.
In my opinion, I do believe that after comparing both the views people who are adjustable and versatile in their lives are able to build a prosperous career and personal life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ions will aid you to be more successful in future. Many individuals do not prefer any d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ondition but also to be more successful in future. To elucidate, people have earned fame ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld a prosperous career and personal life
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15328467153 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92256475209 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514598540146 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7581698759 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379652333673 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152726802204 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705406095824 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22649444811 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777897108422 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.