Some people point out that experiential learning can work well in formal education. However, other think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high school or college?
Over the last few decades, the question of implementing experiential learning instead of traditional way of teaching has become the subject of considerable controversy. Some people tend to consider the last one as outdated approach, while others believe that formal education is more effective method. This essay will prove that experiential studying is more productive nowadays.
To begin with, in today’s rapidly changing word of technology there is a wide range of learning approaches, which people can impose in their study process. Generally, the most predominant one is frequently experiential. Moreover, with the onset and the extensive use of the Internet the education system in many countries has been forced to becoming adaptive. For instance, the last research conducted by Australian Institute of Formal Education has revealed that students who used to learn experientially showed 35% better common knowledge level.
Moreover, another contributing factor is the constant development in education, and its impact on the traditional form of teaching is definitely detrimental. These days, students are used to thinking out of the box, which may be challenging studying with outdated learning form. For example, high schools and colleges in Sydney has started to reform their traditional education system towards experiential and it is quantum leap towards better student’s performance.
In conclusion, despite widely supported opinion about advantages of traditional learning methods, their detrimental factors should not be neglected. I firmly believe that brand new experiential approach in contemporary education is more beneficial.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8347107438 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12366083594 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648760330579 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6422336598 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312278041346 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942115642467 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048525473541 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174013146732 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492665546692 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8347107438 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12366083594 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648760330579 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6422336598 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312278041346 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942115642467 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048525473541 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174013146732 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492665546692 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.