It is thought by some that instead of practical qualification the educational institutes focus on theoretical subjects. I would support this assertion based on potent facts and valid instances.
From the year the children attend school subjects such as mathematics and economic or history are thought theoretically. In other words, students become masters in calculating on paper but not in real life. For instance, instead of teaching students on board how a plant can grow with the special condition of water or soil teachers must ask them to bring a real vase and plant a seed. However, unfortunately, due to the poor system of education, there is no place for this improvement in this matter. Consequently, the national education system of most developing nations brings up many people who are all thumbs when it comes to practicality and productivity with no creative prospects.
Having all said, Not only school students but also graduates from universities confront many critical problems when they want to find a job. To cite an example, there are many graduates from a civil or mechanic major who are not able to run a real project since they have not been taught about these pieces of stuff. It is an irrefutable fact that in the era of globalization the value of degrees has been decreased substantially. In this age of technology, it is vital to acquire practical qualifications along with academic ones.
By way of conclusion, certain sections of society hold this viewpoint that real-life experience comes first in this age and time and most educational systems such as colleges or higher education do not have the expertise to clear up this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05797101449 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96228835175 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2798994171 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130871851154 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451891680613 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370232160615 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800333826535 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142913648918 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.