In modern days, one of the controversial problems is related to surrounding issues. Although many people believe that endangered animals and loss of green nature are a priority problem that is needed to be solved, the rest of them agree that more serious issues human being faced is playing for an important role for changes in the atmosphere. In this essay, I will support both sides with examples and represent a conclusion.
On one side of the argument, there are people who claim that occurrences of worldwide famine are coming from lack of food because last few decades productivity of agriculture is falling because of numerous death of plants leading to drought and deficiency of meat. On the other word, if this tendency is continued, it is inevitable that in the future feeding the increasing population of the world is impossible. One particularly good example is that the reason why in Africa thousands of people such as children and adults are dying is desertification and lack of animals used for a meal.
On the other hand, it is also possible to argue that immorality human activities are destroying the environment we live in. The primary reason for believing this is that it is possible the amount of waste overcame and the use of toxic chemicals is the most dangerous surrounding problems because a lot of amount of garbage results in deterioration of nature and chemical components used in factory becomes a reason of diseases. One of the important illustrations is that recent researches have shown that people living near a place with waste and a factory have more probability to have a cell of cancer.
To sum up, as we have seen, this question is uneasy to discuss. However, I think that the priority environmental problems of human being are the extinction of species of animals and plants as we need to have sufficient food to feed the next generation although other important surrounding problems associated with actions of people are harmful to a healthy life of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
...ming from lack of food because last few decades productivity of agriculture is falling ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
... dangerous surrounding problems because a lot of amount of garbage results in deterioration of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, i think, in fact, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9201183432 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86778583255 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.2767984479 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.181818182 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153019305265 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514206987741 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422922752367 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936459942926 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426539674408 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.