There has been a debade as to whether people should watch movies on their phones or tablets without going to the cinema or people should visit cinemas in order to be fully satisfied with watching a film. I personally believe that attending a cinema is the best way possible to enjoy a movie due to several reasons which will be discussed in the following.
To begin with, cinema has always been a place for people to have a little bit of rest and enjoy a good film during their leisure time. Even though, some time should be spent in order to get to the cinema, the emotions and the experience of seeing the anticipated movie in a group of friends is priceless. Moreover, the big screen and the loud music make the whole process much more interesting, especially if the genre of the film is adventure or fantasy. Afterwards, people can gather and discuss the movie while having a nice walk back to home.
However, in this fast pace world, where phones and tablets are developed every single day, it is almost impossible to keep in track with these improvements. Therefore, everything can be downloaded and seen in the course of one minute. Not only do people use phones and tablets for working but also for texting, listening to music, reading articles and watching films. Although using such small device is easy and more comfortable when everything is just a click away, however constant watching films on a small screen of a phone can weaken one's eyesight. Not to mention the tablet's screen can never give people the same picture as the cinema can.
In conclusion, to me this issue seems almost similar as to whether people should read books or listen to audiobooks. Undoubtedly, listening would save a lot of time, however one can never get the same experience from the process of reading. I believe, film insudtry is a big part of any country's economy, so it is better to support it by seeing the film as always in cinema.
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours.Write a letter to the local council. In your letter-Describe how the rubbish collection system is not working p 89
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have problems as a result. Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 61
- some people say that is important to keep your home and workplace tidy, with everything organized and in the correct place 56
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country. You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for him/her. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter:- Tell your 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There has been a debade as to whether people should watch movies on their pho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...lways been a place for people to have a little bit of rest and enjoy a good film during th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...on a small screen of a phone can weaken ones eyesight. Not to mention the tablets sc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
..., to me this issue seems almost similar as to whether people should read books or listen to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66374269006 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48965061388 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9647781959 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286636740214 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965007139467 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635673787286 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176351363631 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048004976392 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.