Recently, in many developing countries, numerous workforces have migrated to better nations like the European due to the low salaries and unpaid overtime leisures and there is also an increment in tourism. All thanks to the freedom of access over the world and the formation of international languages such as English or Chines. Therefore, it is said that learning a foreign language only serves limited purposes: traveling and working.
First of all, since the invasion of English worldwide decades ago, being able to communicate in more than a language, mother tongue, is compulsory to anyone who wants to widen their opportunities to apply for occupations, especially post-graduate students or get a visa to travel abroad. All the modern business need interaction with outlanders which may cause misunderstanding if they can't acknowledge each other through a dialogue and the same goes with travel aspect. In short, in an assimilating century, the essentials of a global language is undeniable in tourism and work.
When people are overwhelmed with their life and relaxation, they have left behind the true aim of learning a language. Unlike the practical and realistic use in daily life, languages present their own identity of their own regions like the history, the culture, and the civilians' characteristics. For example, in Japan, people usually raise their voices while communicating, which illustrates their pride and brave or in Vietnam the accent in their language tells the listeners about their long history, it usually sounds old and mysterious when spoken. In the busy society nowadays, the initial conception of language has been faded that leads to a misunderstanding of its meaning
In my opinion, self-exploring a language is not only for work or traveling but also finding the characteristics of the ones who speak that language and explore the new culture.
In conclusion, the reason for visiting and work is not leaning a language, it only presents a translating machine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hich may cause misunderstanding if they cant acknowledge each other through a dialog...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...anguage and explore the new culture. In conclusion, the reason for visiting and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31132075472 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08033756113 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3940294284 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.545454545 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185080279914 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749953010293 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760710704472 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112666027177 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468511663252 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.