The learning comes from multiple sources including group activities offered by institutions, hobbies, or interests practiced in their leisure time. Yet, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that parents should motivate their children to participate in organized group activities in their free time. And, others emphasize that it is crucial for youngsters to independently self-learn in managing their leisure time.
On the one side, there are two reasons to substantiate that parents should encourage their children to take part in extracurricular activities. First and foremost it is extremely significant to encourage youngsters to participate in planned group events. These activities put children in teams to work together on a project. This not teaches them teamwork but also improves communication and social skills. To illustrate, dance, music, skit, sports, and many other events develop a plethora of skills along with academics concurrently. Apart from this, it is helpful to accentuate the hidden talent of juveniles as well as provide a platform and better opportunities for professional growth.
On the other hand, some people think children should carry out activities whatever they want. It has its pros and cons as sometimes, a depressed and alone child can indulge himself in harmful activities such as intaking drugs and regular consumption of alcohol. Besides, giving freedom can involve a child in juveniles crimes. However, in my opinion, parents should keep an eye on their children who are engaging themselves in each activity in their free time. Conversely, a child can explore his area of interests to get involved in extracurricular activities which can be a positive development on its mind.
To conclude, participating in organized events is the most efficient way to deliver knowledge to pupils where initially schools have the necessary resources and funding to nurture a juvenile's mind, and parents should encourage their children to take part in such planned activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, so, well, apart from, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43670886076 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00679543352 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 316.0 20.2975951904 1557% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1718.0 106.682146367 1610% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 316.0 20.7667163134 1522% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 127.0 7.06120827912 1799% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404769528066 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.404769528066 0.084324248473 480% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238091113959 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652587584992 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 162.2 13.0946893788 1239% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -257.72 50.2224549098 -513% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 127.7 11.3001002004 1130% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.75 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.71 8.58950901804 276% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 9.78957915832 654% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.4 10.1190380762 1269% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 128.0 10.7795591182 1187% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.