Some people say that school children should learn how to grow food and cook with it in their lessons. What is your opinion about that?
School is the institution where children go to learn things that will be useful for them to survive in this world. Some people believe that schools should introduce classes which will teach learners how to grow and cook food as a part of their curriculum. I strongly support this motion since cooking is one of the essential skills to be taught.
School-going children can be benefitted by learning how to grow food and cook. Since cooking can help young people to prepare food, they will be able to make their favorite dishes. If a child, for instance, is fond of eating pasta, he will be able to eat it in his own house by learning how to bake it. As a result, he does not have to go to the restaurant to eat his favorite meal because he would know how to grow and cook it.
Another reason to teach children growing and cooking food is that it can help them to get familiar with the kitchen. If they get acquainted with the kitchen, then they will be able to help their parents to prepare meals. Since preparing meals requires a lot of things such as cutting vegetables and meats, boiling waters, and heating pan, it will be useful for parents if they can get their children as a helping hand in the kitchen. Furthermore, young people can acquire knowledge of handling things in the kitchen which can make them become proficient in the kitchen environment.
In conclusion, school children should be taught how to grow and cook food so that it can make them good cooks at an early age. Growing and cooking food is a skill which they will be able to apply in their adulthood. So, if a person can become a good cook before he reaches adulthood, he will enjoy a lot of benefits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48376623377 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.392969477 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461038961039 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1574570017 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288859369157 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133111111889 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105260041949 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208998642638 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582265005058 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.4159519038 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.