Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell. Others believe that it is the consumer's responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Presently, with increased focus towards safeguarding the ecology, people are getting increasingly sensitive towards measures to minimise the production of waste. Packaging remains one of the biggest menaces which is a by-product of civilization in this modern world. In spite of this, people unknowingly are consuming heavy packaged products thereby increasing the disposable waste and hence deteriorating the environment. Here, I would discuss on the two important opinions to curb this menace and would also try to conclude on what I feel is the best way forward.
Supermarkets, I believe, is a major point of sale so their role to influence the consumer cannot be undermined. It is of paramount importance to understand that a reduction in packaging in a regular consumed item will have a butterfly effect. For example, making a small change like replacing the plastic covers over bread by paper bags or thinning the milk bottles thereby saving on plastic. What goes in favour of supermarkets is, that the packaging is required to give that extra degree of safety to the product which sometimes is a demand of the customer. This becomes the need of the hour for the store to maintain the store credibility.
Contrary to the thoughts in the above paragraph, there is also a section of people who base their thoughts on the prominent point, demand generates supply. This goes without saying, that the supply would reduce if a section of the consumer would neglect a certain product because of the excess packaging. Eventually, this would become a vicious circle which would result in the end of product life cycle. Either the excess packaging issue would have to be tackled else the product would phase out.
Finally, both the above thoughts need to cohesively work to support the already disturbed ecological imbalance. Nonetheless, I also firmly believe and stand by the statement "Be the change you want to see in the world". In this scenario, the onus definitely would lay on us to safeguard our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | lakhveer khokhar | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | vgoel.rrpl | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | vgoel.rrpl | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | vgoel.rrpl | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | vgoel.rrpl | 78 | view |
- Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o 78
- Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o 78
- Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o 78
- Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o 73
- Some people say Supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging for products they sell Others believe that it is the consumer s responsibility to avoid buying products which have a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your o 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, nonetheless, so, for example, i feel, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12951807229 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85200567107 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.916658893 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220234723275 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697698834489 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580691660939 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121571194882 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552772125768 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.