Some people say supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packages for products they sell. Others say it is the responsibility of consumers by avoiding such products. Discuss both views and provide examples.
Many hypermarkets use plastic in packaging their products as it can store the product for a long time. Many people say that they need to reduce the quantity of packaging and others cite that it is the responsibility of customers to shun such products. This essay will discuss both the views and justify with some illustrations.
It is an irrefutable fact that plastic is the prime causative factor for pollution, and use of plastic in packing will increase it the amount of this un-degradable substance globally. Many companies use polythene to store the product for a long time which directly proportional to the escalation of the use of plastic in daily life. It is said that more than 95% of products which are sold in marts are wrapped in plastic. So supermarts should be responsible to reduce this non-eco-friendly substance.
On the other hand, consumers should be also liable to eradicate these products as they are not only increasing the pollution but also hazardous to health. Plastic contains some chemical variables like carbon and hydrogen which can react with any organic or inorganic substance and results in some detrimental effects. It is exemplified in Thailand that 1562 people were hospitalized and 160 died when they consumed a newly introduced chocolate which is wrapped in plastic. So people should be more accountable for avoiding the products packaged in plastic.
In conclusion, it is evident that plastic is ubiquitous in everyone's sphere. Increase in use of plastic will not only results in increased pollution but also have some deleterious effects on humans. So, both markets and consumers are responsible for use of plastic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 119, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'will' requires base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ncrease in use of plastic will not only results in increased pollution but also have so...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15867158672 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94369672645 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5347047399 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296959327496 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109561975642 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920134120335 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195344190889 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108105044611 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.