Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is the duty of universities to provide quality education to students and enable them to be successful in life. Some people opine that all universities should provide courses related to science and technology that has a high scope of getting jobs. While others argue that universities should also provide subjects such as art, commerce etc. I completely agree with the latter argument that universities should teach all subjects and should not restrict to only certain kinds of subjects.
To begin with, universities need to consider students career before providing a certain course.
Due to globalization, the world will be focused on science and technology. Hence there will be a greater demand for jobs in these fields. Teaching only those kind of subjects will help more students to get a job faster.
For instance, software industries are booming in India. Hence it offers more job opportunity than any other domain. As result companies are recruiting thousands of students from universities related to science and technologies such as engineering. From these perspectives, it seems quite logical for universities to teach only science related subjects.
On the other hand, students should be allowed to follow their passion in life. This is because each individual is unique and gifted with certain talents. For example, Shah Ruch Khan, a veteran actor could achieve huge success in Indian movie industry only because he was able to study in Indian School Of Drama. If all universities were to teach only job oriented subjects, we would have missed a great talented person like him. Also for a country to prosper, it needs individuals from all walks of lives. This would not be possible if all universities teach only a certain set of subjects.
To conclude, universities have to consider the pros and cons of any policy adopted including whether the students are free to pick their subjects or not. Personally, I believe that letting university students prefer their subjects have far more benefits and seem more logical in a broader sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...l be focused on science and technology. Hence there will be a greater demand for jobs...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...for jobs in these fields. Teaching only those kind of subjects will help more students to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ftware industries are booming in India. Hence it offers more job opportunity than any...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...issed a great talented person like him. Also for a country to prosper, it needs indi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17365269461 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76132321123 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1840022371 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345804203987 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102652645506 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632971783873 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163179614414 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807278394318 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.