Some people think that because of email and telephone, communication among people is less personal now than it used to be.
Telephone and email are the results of technological advancement. The modern communication system has made our life comfortable and less laborious. In my view using new methods of communication like telephone or email do not hurt human interaction or relation, rather it makes it more effective.
To initiate with, it is very helpful for students and workers who stay in a foreign country to use email, the Internet and mobile phone to stay connected with their family and relatives. Before we had emails and telephones, those people could scarcely communicate with their family members. For instance, one of my cousins studies in New Zealand and he calls and sends emails to his family and friends regularly. Thanks to the modern technology. Twenty years ago my uncle had been in this same country, and he could rarely contact his family as letter-writing was the only way to communicate then. So I would say those modern technologies have improved the way we communicate these days.
Moreover, modern communication saves time and cost. The speed of electronic mails and phone calls are overwhelming and people are making many friends beyond boundaries. In my view those are all personal and technology has made it possible to keep more personal relationships than ever before. For example, Facebook helped me find many of my childhood friends and I have a good friendship with them now. This, in my opinion, is a good example to illustrate how technology has improved our personal relationship. Next, people nowadays shop, pay bills and do banking online and these online activities save their personal time that they can spend with their friends and family members. Furthermore, emails have quite positive impacts in keeping the bond between people more personal due to its features which allow sharing pictures, videos and important files. People can now communicate in virtual physical presence which is known as video calling and this makes communication easier and more effective.
Before putting my pen down, I would like to say that, telephone and email have a very positive impact on our relationship and communication. Without those, we would have been more isolated and lonely than we can imagine.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16944444444 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83473685281 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552777777778 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2594654631 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9473684211 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216823549949 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665605535046 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439058383333 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123286893952 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596691270332 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.