Some people think a crime should always have
a fixed punishment, like life for murder,
whereas others think you should take the
circumstances of the crime into account. What
is your viewpoint
It is irrefutable that crime level has elevated drastically these days, therefore, it is widely agreed that the best solutions to address such a serious issue by offering a fixed punishment for each type of crime. However, it is argued that the reasons behind any crime should be considered, thus, punishment should be more flexible. This essay aims to examine both views before coming to a conclusion.
It is generally believed that fixed punishment plays a crucial role in alleviating crime level globally. First of all, criminals who are intending to commit a certain crime for any reason will change their mind if they know the subsequent actions against them afterwards. For example, Saudi Arabia has a very low crime index among other advanced nations. Since, they impose and execute very tough punishments such as a death penalty for murders, and drugs smuggling, and life sentence for robberies. Therefore, crime rate is considered extremely low compared with other nations which have no fixed penalties.
On the flip side, it is often pointed out that there are several factors might stand behind any major crime and, therefore, it should be accounted during trials. Firstly, It is very important to investigate the motivations before applying penalties, to ensure a high level of justice. For instance, punishments such as death penalties, and life sentence for murders should be investigated in a high manner as many cases might be self-defense cases against robberies, murders or anyone who is trying to kill people. Secondly, with the aim of reducing the crime level, judges should investigate more about the motivations and reasons that participate in making crime, in order to find a good solutions to address them properly. For example, numerous crimes in several countries have attributed to the poverty, low level of education and other critical factors, so, tackle the core of problem will help to reduce crime.
To sum up, I am in a favor of having a flexible penalties as it provides a high level of justice for all people, since, some crimes might be considered as a self-defense, so that, it is injustice at all to be treated as murders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be accounted during trials. Firstly, It is very important to investigate the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 394, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a high manner" with adverb for "high"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ence for murders should be investigated in a high manner as many cases might be self-defense cas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 695, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...n making crime, in order to find a good solutions to address them properly. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 922, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of problem will help to reduce crime. To sum up, I am in a favor of having a f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 49, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'penalty'?
Suggestion: penalty
...p, I am in a favor of having a flexible penalties as it provides a high level of justice ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustice at all to be treated as murders.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0782122905 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75017555072 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561452513966 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4455013537 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238463366729 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877020487894 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426647492012 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148221494854 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492617769953 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.