Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale, while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion?
In recent time, international bodies have an interest in the most effective ways to tackle environmental challenges. While some feel that all nations should come together to solve these problems, others belong to the school of thought that it is better for each country to manage them. This essay will discuss these viewpoints in order to determine the best option.
On the one hand, it is reasoned that international intervention on environmental management is the best because this problem, in the first place, is a global matter that affects all nations. In other words, an issue with such magnitude should attract concerted efforts from every country. A case in point is a current burning issue on global warming, which nations all over the world have come to recognize as a threat to the human race that requires a holistic approach. Therefore, some strongly feel that no nation should be left out on matters affecting the earth's ecology.
On the other hand, since every country has peculiar environmental challenges, many people feel that each nation should be allowed to deal with them locally. For example, environmental pollutions often associated with crude oil exploration and production are exclusive to oil-bearing countries like Nigeria. Seeking collaborations from non-oil-producing countries to manage such issues would be unfair and counterproductive. So, in as much as every region enjoys the gains of exploiting the environment, they should devise ways to tackle any issues arising therefrom.
To sum up, while some individual feel that problems with the environment should be treated as a worldwide issue because they are global in nature, others argue that a national approach would be better because of the peculiarity of environmental pollutions to certain regions. In my opinion, both local and collaborative efforts should be adopted so as to get a sustainable result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ld be left out on matters affecting the earths ecology. On the other hand, since ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 347, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...collaborative efforts should be adopted so as to get a sustainable result.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34219269103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04724519005 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1300084927 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294696505459 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967647000419 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728909719728 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181346408239 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545091035434 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.