Some people think the government is wasting money on science and this money could better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Developing science and technology always increase the dignity of the nation. Some masses think that authorities using money on science is waste and it can be utilised for other activities. In my view, spending only on science is illogical and I think funds must be utilised in all sectors. I will explain my reasons regarding this argument in the following passage.
On the one hand, developing science and using money for its implementation is useful to the world. Because, science has its own benefits in the society. Hence, without science we cannot have proper medications and efficient treatments to the serious health issues. For example, in olden days there are people who died because of not having appropriate treatment for their ill health. However, development in science has reduced such kind of problems in the world. Furthermore, if the government is not spending money on science and encourage people then, scientists has to bare their spending’s by themselves, which will lead to lack of interest to do new innovations.
On the other hand, spending only on science is meaningless because, there many more things to be developed in our country. For example, money spending on sportsmen also develops the honor of nation. Also, this increase the positive view in individuals about their country. At the same time, the funds can also be used in safety road measures which can avoid various accidents.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that the authorities spending money on science is not at all waste, but the government should also invest funds on other activities which are helpful to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... implementation is useful to the world. Because, science has its own benefits in the so...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, as to, for example, i think, kind of, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1496350365 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75304673833 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547445255474 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4061820753 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194267692505 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674598069803 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548687731791 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120566615471 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482119918022 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.