In recent years, time share equal important just as money. Hence, spending time in life has arisen as one of the hottest topics. There are widely differing views on the issue of whether time should be consumed for the job or family and friends. To understand why there are such conflicting opinions, we must look at the facts in favor of each argument.
On the one hand, many commentators are of the view that there are advantages to spend time for progress in career. From their point of view, improving their careers will automatically reflect positively in the lifestyle on their family and friends and they are able to provide them with better quality life. For instance, a research conducted in the US suggests that individuals who have a good career capable of save money for unforeseen circumstances, as a result, they have supported ever from their family and friends. Furthermore, people who pay more attention to their job not only can provide a special life for their family members but also their social position also improves.
On the other hand, the opponents assert that giving too much time and importance to their work and careers will affect negatively the mental and social behavior. Indeed, in the family life of these individuals' money and materialism take over the position of affection and love. This is amply illustrated if peoples are more and more drowned in their work and careers, they will gradually lose their families and friends. Consequently, in the long term, mental and social health of people put at stake and this situation certainly will be alarming.
By way of conclusion, there are convincing arguments on both sides. It is an undeniable fact that both profession and relatives are important part of an individual's life. Thus, establishing a balance between these two relations is necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...or. Indeed, in the family life of these individuals money and materialism take over the pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... and relatives are important part of an individuals life. Thus, establishing a balance betw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, thus, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02287581699 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6952147557 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9480688004 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181626079223 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650469101461 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553724698293 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108165943994 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031454334971 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.