Some people think its better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them.
Other people believe that it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them
Peers, who are the indispensable part of every individual's life, play a pivotal role in building a character of an individual. The world remains polarised into sections where one section where vehementally perceives that having friends with similar mindset and propositions serve better while others feel that it is better to be friends with someone who have different concepts sometimes. Vowing much respect to the former view, I; however, I am in consummate accord with the latter belief which will be elucidated below.
At the outset, adherents of having same opinionated peers reckon that it certainly will result in the fewer disputes in lieu of friends owning different opinions as the formers will agree to each other on all the matters primarily due to the fact that they see things eye to eye. In a team, for instance, the members who think alike have negligible chances of misunderstanding and conflicts. Therefore, such masses can avoid war of words among themselves.
Apart from this, is there something they may be missing out? Certainly there in as they restrict themselves from learning new things which on the contrary, I perceive, the masses with friends having varied views will learn. In other words, by listening to different thoughts and views about a certain topic apart from one's own will broaden the horizon of oneself. To cite an example, if some friends are talking about corporal punishment, contradicting views will pave the way for them to learn and understand some fresh facts, thereby adding a lot to their cognizance. Hence, I deem that it is a better option.
To conclude, although pals having similar views can enjoy conflict free companionship, to grasp and understand new concepts having mates of distinctive propositions can make a world of difference.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-04 | shain | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Arshdeepmondair | 84 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in cinema Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show US spending patterns from 1966 to 1996 100
- You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect Write a letter to the editor of the magazine In your letter correct the information in the article explain why it is impor 89
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
- Most people take interviews to select a person for job What are the other ways What do you think is the best way to recruit new employees 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...who are the indispensable part of every individuals life, play a pivotal role in building a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, talking about, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13993174061 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80183368336 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617747440273 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1931899534 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262722774481 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07892180972 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696224193364 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145310839074 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521588094504 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.