Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that the animals are the necessary part of diet. what is you opinion?

Essay topics:

Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that the animals are the necessary part of diet. what is you opinion?

The existence of human beings hinges on various food items. Even though there are different people like carnivorous and herbivorous, the former is seen the more. However, a school of thought believes that animals should not be slaughtered for food. Another section stresses that it is the vital part of human diet. My conviction tends me to go with meat for diet.

As meat records a long history as diet, it is very much indispensible in man’s life. What pops up human health is the nutritional value of the food consumed. Being rich in proteins, vitamins, minerals etc, it keeps a man as fit as a fiddle. There are certain terrains like desert where people can only be carnivorous because those terrains cannot have any agricultural yield. That people in the Middle East depend on camel and lamb meat for their existence is the best example in this case. Owing to the exponential rise in human population, the amount of cultivable land is reduced alarmingly. Hence people are left with only the choice of meat for diet.

Meat has as much therapeutic use as herbs. In the absence of meat consumption and with the only consumption of vegetables, a human body might become a hospital of many diseases. Even though the intake of vegetables as diet sounds to be logical, the unpredictable weather patterns cannot assure the cultivation throughout the seasons. As animals unlike plants survive in testing conditions, it turns out to be the most dependable food. Even though the slaughtering of animals appears to be bestial, something has to be sacrificed for the survival of humans. As animals are part of natural food chain, if it is not killed for diet, its growing population might destabilize the ecosystem. The factors like its easy availability and long preservability make it the most dependable diet for human beings.

Having dwelled on such thoughts, the human survival is not as easy as it seems. In the midst of depleting natural foods, slaughtering animal for diet cannot be held heinous. The cycle of the nature puts human beings on top of its priorities. Hence the consumption of animal meat should be considered a humanly activity not a brutal one

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... cultivable land is reduced alarmingly. Hence people are left with only the choice of...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... human beings on top of its priorities. Hence the consumption of animal meat should b...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('humanly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('activity') instead of another adjective.
...ion of animal meat should be considered a humanly activity not a brutal one
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, well, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93732970027 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78396518941 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523160762943 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0598756107 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.7826086957 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9565217391 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.52173913043 7.06120827912 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221899570137 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697551232306 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06768417705 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151488037437 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423547964318 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.