Some people think that new technologies benefits the life of workers whereas some deny the statement.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Technological advancements have certainly impacted every aspect of our lives. To which, it is believed by some people that it has uplifted the quality of life of employees while others argue that it has more detrimental effect on life as whole. In my opinion, although technology has some limitations, it has played a huge role in making workers life easy and more comfortable.
To Begin with, people are not bounded to go to office for work anymore; they can continue their work from virtually anywhere, which was impossible in the past. For example, work emails can be checked on the smartphones to stay updated about the progress at office. Moreover, technology has revolutionized the safety standards at work, which used to be very pathetic and had caused numerous casualties and deaths, by installation cutting-edge sensors, such fire alarm, to prevent any accident. In short, technology has made work environment more flexible and safe.
However, some organizations misuse the concept of work-from-home to slog their employees 24*7 to meet unachievable goals; as a result people continue to work beyond business hours. In other words, people are made slave to their work, they leave the office but they never leave the work, which is dangerous to health in the long run. For instance, IT employees in India work for 80 hours a week either from home or office. Continuous sitting in front of computers can have deteriorating impact on health, ignorance to which can have serious consequences in the long run. So advance devices have blurred out the balance between life and work.
In Conclusion, extensive usage of technology for nonstop working has negative impact but it cannot outweigh its wide applications if it is used more sensibly. Thus, people have to create clear boundaries between their work and life to make technology more effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15181518152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84623569483 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1376579284 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129015451718 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545560284353 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609255240543 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101083849825 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803385778467 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.