Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol (gasoline). Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, carbon footprint and Traffic jam have become significant issues among countries; Governments ought to impose laws to reduce these problems. I believe that increasing the price and tax of Fuel has negatives outnumber positives. In this essay, both advantages and disadvantages will be discussed before concluding.
One main positive consequence of the increasing of tax is that people maybe reduce the using of their private cars; they would like to safe their funds. In addition to that, some people will start to use public transportation such as Buses and Metros which will help to reduce pollution and traffic impact. Moreover, at least they are going to limit travelling a long distance by using their cars. A prime example of that when Saudi Arabia put more tax on petrol, congestion decrease by 70% in the big towns. Hence, increasing the price of gasoline may help to solve the problem of carbon gas emissions and traffic problem.
Despite this, there are more negatives as well. Firstly, if the authorities increase the tax on petrol, this will harm social-economic. In other words, the prices of goods and essential items will be increased; the transportation of those items will be higher. Furthermore, the cost of transportation will be high which will affect poor people. It can be witnessed in Egypt where decision-makers have imposed laws for increasing fuel price, the price of food items has been increased accordingly. Thus, increasing tax of petrol products is not the solution to pollution and traffic; it has a detrimental effect on people's lives.
It can be concluded that put more tax on petrol is not a sufficient solution for some circumstance such as congestion and reduce the greenhouse gases, and it has demerits outweigh merits. It is recommended that governments should search for another solution to tackle these issues, for example, encouraging the use of public transportation, and make it more comfortable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rbon gas emissions and traffic problem. Despite this, there are more negatives a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortation, and make it more comfortable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, at least, for example, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19936708861 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98878123172 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3906218203 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301305238344 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901493179798 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729708688737 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16846570308 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282715255431 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.