Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
History, at its simplest, is the study of past events. It is an account of the nation’s period of glory and struggle. Some people believe that studying history is not at all consequential while others have a judgement that it is essential to have cognizance about history. But is studying past subsidiary or is it just a waste of time? This will be discussed further in this essay
History, a subject is extraneous in edifying institutions because students are required to memorize dates, names and facts that are nugatory in everyday life. Erudition of the history is not even consequential because each historical event is perceived differently by different people. “We learn from history that we learn nothing from history”, many people believe in this verbalization because they have a perspective that history is a subject infrequently used in people's lives, on the contrary, one should fixate on advances in science and technology that are more pertinent to the future amendment of society.
On the other hand, History avails people to understand the culture and the evolution of the nation. It withal provides insight into what the great bellwethers have endured in the past to make the world what it is now. It is paramount to recollect these occurrences to commemorate the country's sacrifices. Additionally, learning history as well as erudition of the past is preparing for the future. It is simply serialized that those who have no understanding of history are doomed to reiterate this. For instance, when homogeneous past events are reported and analysed in detail, opportune measures can be taken to mitigate the effects of natural calamities such as floods.
To conclude, albeit many people believe that kenning history is nonessential, nevertheless, it is incontrovertible that the advantages of learning history outweigh the disadvantages. Studying history can not only deepen and broaden the erudition, but withal contribute to the development of analytical puissance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37025316456 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13265566019 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.082491077 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.133333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229832273153 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739322620535 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681117653371 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141385568582 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650606241926 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.