Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference.
The shocking phenomenon of global climate change recently come to the forefront. Some feel that individual people and their action will not have an effect on climate change. However, I agree with those who say that everyone has a responsibility to save their environment. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint on the matter.
Regarding those who feel that individual behavior does not affect global warming, there exist valid reason. The main justification is that global warming is simply too vast to be effective on such a small level. And, they believe that only large business houses and government can bring a change. The Oregonian reported just last week that large manufacturing houses and government together reduced the carbon emission by 20% which brings some delay in global warming process.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion in good conscious. The fact is that with the individuals can contribute to building friendly environment as well. In Austria, for instance, an estimated 100,000 individuals recycled their household products which help them in the reducing their demand for some of the product that reduces pressure on the manufacturer. The Harvard reported that initiative of Austrian citizen proved that individuals’ contribution also slows down the foster process of global warming.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that only government and large business can bring change and pitches in, normal people like you and me can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands that global climate change and give their contribution to a better healthy environment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some delay in global warming process. Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...p them in the reducing their demand for some of the product that reduces pressure on the ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34444444444 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90048952871 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9414714151 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316224312056 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100061252292 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890575984338 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180464552926 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043070761321 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.