The shocking phenomenon of global climate change recently come to the forefront. Some feel that individual people and their action will not have an effect on climate change. However, I agree with those who say that everyone has a responsibility to save their environment. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint on the matter.
Regarding those who feel that individual behavior does not affect global warming, there exist valid reason the main justification is that global warming is simply too vast to be effective on such a small level. And, they believe that only large manufacturers and lawmakers can bring a change. The Oregonian reported just last week that large manufacturing and government together treat industrial waste before sending the chemical treated water into the rivers and reutilize some of the refurbished metals products that helped them reduced the carbon emission by 20% which help in delay global warming process.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion in good conscious. The fact is that with the individuals can contribute to building friendly environment as well. The Harvard reported that Austrian citizen who take early initiative, an estimated 100,000 individuals recycled their household products which help them in the reducing their demand for some of the artifact that condenses pressure on the manufacturer. The Harvard reported that initiative of Austrian citizen proved that individuals’ contribution also slows down the foster process of global warming.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that only authorities and large business can bring change and pitches in, normal people like others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands that global climate change and give their contribution to a better healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 476, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ted water into the rivers and reutilize some of the refurbished metals products that helped...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h help in delay global warming process. Nevertheless, I cannot hold that opinion...
^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...p them in the reducing their demand for some of the artifact that condenses pressure on the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...condenses pressure on the manufacturer. The Harvard reported that initiative of Aus...
^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the foster process of global warming. In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bution to a better healthy environment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38851351351 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91218371786 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2160618715 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311349217566 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999454835919 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799843181375 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173349701309 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376908414517 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.