Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Hiring new workers is an arguably the most contentious issue these days, as people have split into two groups, some of them think that any firm should hire those staff who can work independently without direct instructions by their employers, while others believe workers should be selected to work in a team. This essay aims to discuss both views in further detail before coming to a conclusion.
To begin with, there is no doubt that some certain rules might limit independent workers to perform their job properly as well as it might affect on the final results. For instance, a plethora of artists in various companies prefer to work alone in terms of not be distracted by their colleagues, or even the fixed company working hours. Since they might spend too much hours to finalize their assignments. In fact, they considered the company as their own one. Therefore, they work very hard to ensure high quality and eventually impressive revenue for their organizations.
On the flip side, it's irrefutable that most of the advanced companies nowadays are relying on team collaboration. Thus, they tend to select candidates based on their synergistic and communication skills. To illustrate, plenty of firms have set some goals and objectives which are largely impossible to be achieved in short time by a solo performance. Therefore, they distribute various tasks among employees according to their specialities. As a result of such systematic performance, company most likely will reach to their expectation or might exceed it. Finally clear and united instruction will make a justice environment in the company. To elaborate, all workers, regardless of their positions might fairly treated based on the company standards.
To sum up, although working as a solo might be in some particular circumstances good for companies to ensure high quality of provided services, I wholeheartedly believe that collaboration is the key of any success, therefore I agree to hire people to work in a team.
Hiring new workers is an arguably the most contentious issue these days, as people have split into two groups, some of them think that any firm should hire those staff who can work independently without direct instructions by their employers, while others believe workers should be selected to work in a team. This essay aims to discuss both views in further detail before coming to a conclusion.
To begin with, there is no doubt that some certain rules might limit independent workers to perform their job properly as well as it might affect on the final results. For instance, a plethora of artists in various companies prefer to work alone in terms of not be distracted by their colleagues, or even the fixed company working hours. Since they might spend too much hours to finalize their assignments. In fact, they considered the company as their own one. therefore, they work very hard to ensure high quality and eventually impressive revenue for their organizations.
On the flip side, it's irrefutable that most of the advanced companies nowadays are relying on team collaboration. Thus, they tend to select candidates based on their synergistic and communication skills. To illustrate, plenty of firms have set some goals and objectives which are largely impossible to be achieved in short time by a solo performance. therefore, they distribute various tasks among employees according to their specialities. As a result of such systematic performance, company most likely will reach to their expectation or might exceed it. finally clear and united instruction will make a justice environment in the company. To elaborate, all workers, regardless of their positions might fairly treated based on the company standards.
To sum up, although working as a solo might be in some particular circumstances good for companies to ensure high quality of provided services, I wholeheartedly believe that collaboration is the key of any success, therefore I agree to hire people to work in a team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... their job properly as well as it might affect on the final results. For instance, a plet...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r even the fixed company working hours. Since they might spend too much hours to fina...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rking hours. Since they might spend too much hours to finalize their assignments. In...
^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...onsidered the company as their own one. therefore, they work very hard to ensure high qua...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ed in short time by a solo performance. therefore, they distribute various tasks among em...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in fact, in short, no doubt, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20987654321 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95448085033 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614197530864 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2584210684 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242712315332 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673826647015 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692555466521 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157499872862 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942438527392 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.