The birth of Internet has brought a revolution in the way humans lead their lives. The World Wide Web Servers now host millions of records related to the information about multiple areas of interest, including medicine. As a result, many individuals these days are referring to channels such as Youtube to find remedies for many health-related issues. For many reasons, this is a good development.
To elaborate, Internet acts as a virtual doctor in many instances. Often, people find it tough to afford a visit to the hospital, especially in places where insurance is mandatory. For instance, while having a health insurance is mandatory in the USA, many poor people does not have one. As a result, some of them try to find a solution by browsing in their smartphones or computers, by skipping a trip to doctor. Additionally, immediately after an accident or a hazard, this acts as a quick turnaround than the human rescuers. In other words, many first-aid tricks can be found on the internet in a single click.
However, there are some constraints that limits the ability of these devices; availability of electricity is one of them. Moreover, suggestions acquired from certain websites may not be accurate enough and may sometimes lead to undesired consequences which could deteriorate the health further. Owing to the fact that certain symptoms can only be identified perfectly by a real doctor, the search results on google cannot be trusted each time.
In essence, although the human interaction is ever irreplaceable, internet can fulfill the needs of many patients considering their financial situation and time available. So, I think people need to act as per the seriousness of the injury or disease.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.128113879 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96616601935 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5093727846 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116291254905 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381692300613 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245754524542 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656706847776 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201517130563 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.