Sports contribute a considerable percentage to the growth of individuals and nations. But, there is a notion that hosting international competition events such as world cup carry more disadvantages, which I strongly disagree for the following reasons.
To begin with, sports meet gives a chance for nationals around the globe to visit a country. As a result, the traditions and cultural heritage of that nation can be showcased to the visitors. This way, the tourism industry gets benefited enormously. For instance, the stats show that after china conducted the 2008 Olympics, the number of tourists going there annually have increased by multi folds. This also helps in creating new jobs thus enhancing the economy of the country.
Secondly, such events give birth to new sports in many countries. In other words, in countries like India, there are only a couple of sports which have popularity among its citizens. Therefore, activities such as commonwealth games can help advertise about unknown sports such as fencing, polo, and judo. Furthermore, fans of reputed players get a chance to meet them when they come to play during these events.
Although there are many positives, many times these events leave nations with huge debts which are a result of spending too much on infrastructure. Moreover, the stadiums and sporting goods created for the same purpose are often unused later. A good example is Greece, whose economy faltered badly following the 2004 Olympics. Even until today, they failed to recover from the post shackles.
Overall, I think the cons of arranging big sporting events are negligible and the outcomes are often beneficial to both the public and the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70366893414 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655677655678 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4349709997 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137101314015 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384136469391 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404845856195 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080398328923 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469473597065 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.