Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about the danger of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is considered that ex-convicts, who are good citizens, need to be given a talk to school children about the consequences of committing a crime. I disagree with the fact.
To embark upon, most of the criminals have breached law again and again and could not be considered as a responsible citizen. These criminals are from dysfunctional families are generally less educated and are no longer appreciated by society. Criminals explaining their experiences to children tend to have an adverse effect on their receptive minds as they could try to execute such acts either with their families or friends at school. Also, students are not secured with these ex-convicts. Therefore, criminals sharing their imprisonment experiences with children have repercussions for children.
Furthermore, instead of criminals imparting education to students, the school should upgrade their curriculums and add subjects related to crime in a society that may include case studies of major criminals and their dreadful life in prison. This initiative not only generates awareness but also turn them into a good citizen. Also, police can take the initiative to share with students among various criminal trials in the form of awareness programs. Even parents can play a crucial role in guiding students about the dangers of committing a crime. Hence, there are various other ways to enlighten students about criminal activities.
In conclusion, I believe that ex-convicts' guiding students about the dangers of carrying out crime seem to be the less effective method because it can be dangerous for children and there are better ways available to counsel them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | Kuldeep Kumar | 67 | view |
- In some countries prison is the most common solution to the problem of crime However the more effective solution is to provide people with better education so that they do not commit a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about the danger of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is shown that many criminals have a low level of education some people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate them in prison so that they can find a job after they leave prison To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is to join the gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views 73
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is to join the gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88726684502 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4484919242 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152258117498 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595896384687 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458865844026 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109219494126 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472508930335 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35907335907 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88726684502 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4484919242 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152258117498 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595896384687 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458865844026 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109219494126 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472508930335 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.