People have different opinion regarding the selection of employees. However, some people think that young employees are more efficient, energetic and goal achiever. On the other hand, majority of views quiet different, they believe that old candidates are more reliable, they have vast knowledge related to organization. In my opinion, I would like to agree with that youngster are multi-talented and they have performed their responsibilities in effective manners.
At begin with, there are many aspects who can proof that fresh blood are more determinate to their work, they are performed multitasking work at the same time. I put in to three segments, Firstly, employees are the assets of the organization if they are capable to achieve long term goal and make a successful plan to establish organization portfolio, they are highly recommended to senior post and majority of young candidates are risk taking, they do many courses regarding business management, time management and so on. In addition, young candidates are more qualified they attend many practical training during the studies such as internship, article ship etc. Even, when they start their practical life they have vast knowledge about business industries because their mindset is perfect for trigger new ideas and schemes. Nowadays, market environment has totally dilemma and the reason behind it new technology, advance services, customer dealings etc just because of this things young people are easily maintain good relationship with customer and it is the best way to increase company goal.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable that old employees are more reliable to their company they have vast knowledge about company but issue is that they have limited source of information, they does not perform multitasking work just because of poor health issue. Moreover, majority of people are retired after 60, they just fulfill company requirement they have no interest for company targets, achievements and so on.
To put in it nutshell, I pen down saying that young employees are more valuable for the company rather than old employees just because of various factors which can improve company evolution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun training seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much practical training', 'a good deal of practical training'.
Suggestion: much practical training; a good deal of practical training
...ndidates are more qualified they attend many practical training during the studies such as internship, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates are more qualified they attend many practical training during the studies su...
^^
Line 3, column 976, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., customer dealings etc just because of this things young people are easily maintain...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...ave limited source of information, they does not perform multitasking work just beca...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, as to, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38081395349 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79216137729 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1947355432 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.25 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180786805474 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809114059431 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657133623788 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143281801848 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591950814019 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.