Despite of the rapid developing of farm sector, problem of hunger has become one of the topical questions requiring immediate attention. It occurs, because not only develop of technology influents on a harvest, but also weather, environment problems, economic situation and so on. This approach is especially pressing in Africa and we can deal with it only involving developing countries where agricultural methods are more high-tech.
There are a lot of factors which have a great impact on lack of provision in Third World countries, in other words it happens not only due to not enough up-to date technologies applied in this sector. For instance, entrepreneurs don’t see a sense to convey any goods in places, where habitants can’t afford to pay for good enough money to make businessmen a profit. Let’s take an example, there was famous case, when suppliers had to get rid of their products because of vast cost if its transportation, although on that moment a lot of people needed convenience food around the world.
Furthermore, we can handle with hangover only working together. Technology in farm sphere is developing, but it doesn’t mean that they are applied in every country in the World. European countries should share their progressive ideas and ways how they do to have a maximum profit from farms, since where problems of poor hangover is appropriate there is no time to think over some fresh technological methods.
To conclude, there is no doubt that we should to concern about lack of goods in some countries in the World, but to solve it successfully we must evaluate and take into account every factors leading to such crucial consequences. In addition to this, we can cope with it if we do it together across the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k of provision in Third World countries, in other words it happens not only due t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, third, for instance, in addition, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03412969283 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88339150665 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8218832057 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.090909091 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132692925492 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496863110343 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367234247476 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761394164126 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247644113835 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.