However, there are many technical improvements and innovations invented dramatically in cultivation to improve the crops, thousands of people still have the issue of starving. In this case, economical, climatic and political reasons are causing to this concerning phenomenon.
Initially, because of people’s capacity to purchase food, famine or food scarcity occurs through the world. Even though, poor people grow their food or not, the rich will authorize that they always have bigger piece of pie. Also, increasing cost of sustenance can affect negatively to people who have lower income. Most of the poor people do not own any land. Consequently, they cannot grow their own food.
Then, the change in climate is also one of the substantial reasons. In some countries, extreme drought remains for years. For instance, it has not poured any drop of rain for several years in some parts of Africa. As a result, people are unable to cultivate their own crops. Furthermore, some political reasons also contribute to this problem, such as refusing to share the water resources with other countries because of their enmity between the nations. Unfortunately, food safety in those countries not having adequate water resources of their own faces grave condition.
In the proposed solution, the governments need to focus more attention on that the food supply is impartial for poor people. Food can be available for poor for free or at concessional rates by the political policy. Moreover, affluent countries which grow surplus food should show the magnanimity to share their excess with deficient countries. International organizations can play a major role in regulation to provide support.
To conclude, if this is caused by the inequitable allocation of wealth and resources, more people would continue to hunger despite of any benefits of agriculture. Sharing the feasibilities to poor ones is a proper way to save their lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34201954397 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89239442803 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7682343759 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1406953649 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411578895916 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476601632828 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867467375957 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511389252613 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.