In this technological era, there is a huge advancement in agriculture, however, these advancements are only for developed countries because there is a huge population who are not getting food for their life. In this essay, I will discuss the problem behind this and their solutions, In my opinion, the main problem in some countries they are not educated enough to use this technology.
Firstly, the population is less educated and those who are educated they not doing farming they are engaged in other sectors because that the new technology is not used properly by them and the farmers using their traditional methods for instance Punjab using advanced technology for farming purposes they using combine machine for cutting wheat and making further things out of their waste, but in other states of India they are just burning this waste because they have no technology and that much labor to handle the waste so, because of this they have huge land but the production is less.
Certainly, some countries who are developing countries are financially not capable to buy such advanced machines even though they are also facing so many natural calamities like flood, famine, and drought. though they are not capable to manage all these together and they seek advanced countries' help for tackling the weather phenomenon by using advanced seed, financial help so they overcome the situation like from past few years India giving aid to the Srilanka for their calamity conditions.
Encapsulation, advancement id not only the solution to curb hunger so but many advancements also are not enough to deter hunger and there is a need for a solution for solving these problems by financially helping or educating people about how to use them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...mities like flood, famine, and drought. though they are not capable to manage all thes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07665505226 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62900702492 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519163763066 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 20.2975951904 232% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 141.353772107 49.4020404114 286% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 242.833333333 106.682146367 228% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.8333333333 20.7667163134 230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126698034859 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853999719795 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546311333932 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972710841196 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573922884652 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.4 13.0946893788 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 11.3001002004 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.1190380762 206% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.