Sugar is not good for health. Some people think that government is responsible for limiting the consumption of sugar. While others think that it is an individual who should be responsible for how much sugar he should eat. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
There are split opinions regarding the usage of sugar in the country. A section of society believes that government should be responsible to minimize the sugar consumption in the country, whereas another group of thinkers opine that it is individual responsibility to check on sugar utility. Before commenting on my decisions, I would discuss both the aspects in the ensuing paragraphs.
Examining the former opinion, the foremost argument that proponents put forward is easy availability of the sugar in the market. People are persuaded to buy it because of its taste, which is pleasing to people of all the ages. Therefore, government should take some actions that can reduce the availability of sugars in the market. For example, government can impose tax on buying and selling of sugary food. If the item is costly then automatically its consumption would be in control.
Moreover, the government can run the awareness programs so that people understand the detrimental effects of sugars on the body. In this way people would understand the importance of eating healthy food instead of consuming excessive sugars. Thus, government can play important role in preventing people from consuming sugars.
However, the critics argue that it is individual who can keep control on consumption of sugar. He knows how much sugar should he consume on daily basis and he acts accordingly. So self-control is the only way to keep the consumption of sugars in control.
To recapitulate and give my opinion, I pen down saying that government should be responsible to authorize on the consumption of sugars in the country by heavy taxation and running awareness programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d to buy it because of its taste, which is pleasing to people of all the ages. Therefore, g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...x on buying and selling of sugary food. If the item is costly then automatically i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23880597015 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9746459623 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541044776119 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3109685876 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39292948711 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11718046966 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759207037586 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205417664155 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609246170268 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.