Human nature is extremely fickle, thus, we are easily influenced by possesion of others and tremendous desire of fashion and commodity possesion are prominently reflected the depth of this trend. I firmly uphold the assertion and represent some facts to substantiate my view in following essay.
Firstly, youngsters of contemporary era are quite vulnerable and get easily enticed to outward appearance of others. Thus, industrialist hire celebrities of having huge fan power to advertise their products. Consequently, insatiable desire of looking like their favourite stars arouse the curiosity to spend lavishly on these clothes which culminated later as a trend that often followed by enormous masses.
Secondly, nowadays, we are living in materialistic society. Things such as computer and mobile phone, that was symbol of luxurious lifestyle in past has become the necessities of present. Therefore, people often purchase these on the basis of reviews of others about reliability, productivity and properties of product which leads to product in trending. For instance: all over the world mostly people are using iphone because it not only provide better service to consumer but also has become trace of prestige.
On the other hand, replication sometimes causes uncontrolled havoc that affect the whole community. To illustrate: in 1998, sony had inadvertentally sold 700000 camcorders to its customers that had adriotness to see through clothes as a result myriad of naked pictures had been posted on internet within minutes. In other words, copying others and follow a specefic trend sometimes bring devastation in life.
To conclude, cribbing has become indispensable which yield fruitful results to some industries and also these clothes and other products that are in the market represent the status of person in community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to its customers that had adriotness to see through clothes as a result myriad o...
^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roducts that are in the market represent the status of person in community.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54609929078 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93696669226 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8466286777 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0534423954764 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.015156926934 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0179049459754 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0279312697193 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105307455058 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.